Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Feb Mon 26, 2007 2:31 am
- Contact:
Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done
Try saying that ten times fast.
I came across a news thread about this topic over at Visions Fantastic (on of the other daily Disney sites I go through) and I found another link to it on a Blogspot entry.
http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... -done.html
and
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... PV20090209
What are your thoughts on this? I, personally, believe that Dreamworks doesn't need to distribute their non-animated movies through Disney. They've been doing a good job by themselves. Jumping the shark, anyone?
I came across a news thread about this topic over at Visions Fantastic (on of the other daily Disney sites I go through) and I found another link to it on a Blogspot entry.
http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... -done.html
and
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... PV20090209
What are your thoughts on this? I, personally, believe that Dreamworks doesn't need to distribute their non-animated movies through Disney. They've been doing a good job by themselves. Jumping the shark, anyone?
Last edited by elizabethswann on Feb Mon 09, 2009 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- PeopleMover People Mover
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Mar Sat 31, 2007 1:56 am
- Location: The lost city of Atlanta
I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that? 

~ Caroline
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]
You are right, but it was more of a Katzenberg/Eisner squabble. Katzenberg had a great track record at Disney, especially in animation. But this deal is for live action and DW spun that off from animation so the deal is probably mostly between Spielberg and Disney anyway.DisBeamer wrote:I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that?
It'd be really interesting if, as suggested in the article, we could get a Roger Rabbit sequel.
No one's gloomy or complaining while the flatware's entertaining.
-
- Fantasyland Theater Projectionist
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Jan Wed 28, 2009 6:17 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
- Contact:
Just in case anyone is confused, apparently this is JUST for Dreamwork's live-action movies, and only for future ones. So no animated movies, past or present. That makes me feel a lot better, because I think a majority of Dreamwork's animated movies are...shall we say, not in keeping with Disney's tone or quality, and have no place with the company.
No idea what this will mean for park stuff...we could see more non-Disney attractions like Star Tours or Indiana Jones, or we may not.
No idea what this will mean for park stuff...we could see more non-Disney attractions like Star Tours or Indiana Jones, or we may not.
[img]http://i44.tinypic.com/r76ikm.jpg[/img]
- Spareoom.net
Your place for everything Narnia!
- Spareoom.net
Your place for everything Narnia!
-
- Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
- Posts: 5834
- Joined: Feb Mon 26, 2007 2:31 am
- Contact:
From what I have read and understand, Katzenberg is either no longer with DreamWorks or is now just with DreamWorks Animation (distributed or owned by Paramount). I could be wrong, but I don't know.DisBeamer wrote:I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that?
We are all a little weird
And life's a little weird,
And when we find someone whose
Weirdness is compatible with ours,
We join up with them and fall in
Mutual weirdness and call it Love.”
― Dr. Seuss
Eames: Listen, if you're gonna perform INCEPTION, you need IMAGINATION.
And life's a little weird,
And when we find someone whose
Weirdness is compatible with ours,
We join up with them and fall in
Mutual weirdness and call it Love.”
― Dr. Seuss
Eames: Listen, if you're gonna perform INCEPTION, you need IMAGINATION.
-
- PeopleMover People Mover
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Mar Sat 31, 2007 1:56 am
- Location: The lost city of Atlanta
That's a good point; I remember reading about it in Disney War. I suppose with Eisner not there anymore, the issue between them might be moot.horizons1 wrote:You are right, but it was more of a Katzenberg/Eisner squabble.
Also a good point. I read somewhere that he was up to something else. Come to think of it, is Geffen still involved with Dreamworks? That was the trio that made up the SKG. Maybe they're just S now.MadEye wrote:From what I have read and understand, Katzenberg is either no longer with DreamWorks or is now just with DreamWorks Animation (distributed or owned by Paramount). I could be wrong, but I don't know.
~ Caroline
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]
-
- Submarine Voyage Captain
- Posts: 6842
- Joined: Jun Sun 25, 2006 12:11 pm
- Location: Chattanooga Tn
- Contact:
Re: Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done
This seems to be more for Disney's benefit then Dreamworks. I don't understand or didn't realize that Spielberg and Disney had patched up their differences. Wasn't there a falling out during the Eisner (elizabethswann wrote:Try saying that ten times fast.
I came across a news thread about this topic over at Visions Fantastic (on of the other daily Disney sites I go through) and I found another link to it on a Blogspot entry.
http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... -done.html
and
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... PV20090209
What are your thoughts on this? I, personally, believe that Dreamworks doesn't need to distribute their non-animated movies through Disney. They've been doing a good job by themselves. Jumping the shark, anyone?

I can understand with the quality of Dreamworks productions and the recent downward trend of Touchstones productions why Disney would want to do this. It keeps going through my head that it must have been a great deal for Spielberg.
"Our dreams can come true - if we have the courage to pursue them" WED
"There's a fine prow on that steamer, let's climb aboard her!" Fireside
"You're off the map mateys..Here there be SeaMonsters!!"
The original "LICENSE MAYHEM MARAUDER!!

"There's a fine prow on that steamer, let's climb aboard her!" Fireside
"You're off the map mateys..Here there be SeaMonsters!!"
The original "LICENSE MAYHEM MARAUDER!!

