Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done

Movies, TV, music, and more. Here's the place to talk about anything Disney outside of the parks.

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
elizabethswann
Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
Posts: 5834
Joined: Feb Mon 26, 2007 2:31 am
Contact:

Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done

Post by elizabethswann » Feb Mon 09, 2009 3:50 pm

Try saying that ten times fast.

I came across a news thread about this topic over at Visions Fantastic (on of the other daily Disney sites I go through) and I found another link to it on a Blogspot entry.

http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... -done.html

and
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... PV20090209

What are your thoughts on this? I, personally, believe that Dreamworks doesn't need to distribute their non-animated movies through Disney. They've been doing a good job by themselves. Jumping the shark, anyone?
Last edited by elizabethswann on Feb Mon 09, 2009 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

DisBeamer
PeopleMover People Mover
PeopleMover People Mover
Posts: 1487
Joined: Mar Sat 31, 2007 1:56 am
Location: The lost city of Atlanta

Post by DisBeamer » Feb Mon 09, 2009 4:21 pm

I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that? :?
~ Caroline

[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]

horizons1
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2826
Joined: Mar Thu 18, 2004 4:18 pm
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Contact:

Post by horizons1 » Feb Mon 09, 2009 5:43 pm

DisBeamer wrote:I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that? :?
You are right, but it was more of a Katzenberg/Eisner squabble. Katzenberg had a great track record at Disney, especially in animation. But this deal is for live action and DW spun that off from animation so the deal is probably mostly between Spielberg and Disney anyway.

It'd be really interesting if, as suggested in the article, we could get a Roger Rabbit sequel.
No one's gloomy or complaining while the flatware's entertaining.

Gymfan15
Fantasyland Theater Projectionist
Fantasyland Theater Projectionist
Posts: 188
Joined: Jan Wed 28, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Contact:

Post by Gymfan15 » Feb Mon 09, 2009 8:55 pm

Just in case anyone is confused, apparently this is JUST for Dreamwork's live-action movies, and only for future ones. So no animated movies, past or present. That makes me feel a lot better, because I think a majority of Dreamwork's animated movies are...shall we say, not in keeping with Disney's tone or quality, and have no place with the company.

No idea what this will mean for park stuff...we could see more non-Disney attractions like Star Tours or Indiana Jones, or we may not.
[img]http://i44.tinypic.com/r76ikm.jpg[/img]
- Spareoom.net
Your place for everything Narnia!

elizabethswann
Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
Pirates of the Caribbean Buccaneer
Posts: 5834
Joined: Feb Mon 26, 2007 2:31 am
Contact:

Post by elizabethswann » Feb Mon 09, 2009 8:59 pm

I've edited out the post to add another link to an article and to clarify that it's their non-animated movies that are involved.

MadEye
Haunted Mansion Butler
Haunted Mansion Butler
Posts: 3685
Joined: Jun Sat 07, 2008 5:18 pm

Post by MadEye » Feb Mon 09, 2009 10:24 pm

DisBeamer wrote:I find this really strange. Maybe I'm completely misremembering history here, but didn't Dreamworks specifically set up to be a competitor? After Katzenberg had his falling out with Disney? Am I hallucinating that? :?
From what I have read and understand, Katzenberg is either no longer with DreamWorks or is now just with DreamWorks Animation (distributed or owned by Paramount). I could be wrong, but I don't know.
We are all a little weird
And life's a little weird,
And when we find someone whose
Weirdness is compatible with ours,
We join up with them and fall in
Mutual weirdness and call it Love.”
― Dr. Seuss

Eames: Listen, if you're gonna perform INCEPTION, you need IMAGINATION.

DisBeamer
PeopleMover People Mover
PeopleMover People Mover
Posts: 1487
Joined: Mar Sat 31, 2007 1:56 am
Location: The lost city of Atlanta

Post by DisBeamer » Feb Thu 12, 2009 3:25 am

horizons1 wrote:You are right, but it was more of a Katzenberg/Eisner squabble.
That's a good point; I remember reading about it in Disney War. I suppose with Eisner not there anymore, the issue between them might be moot.
MadEye wrote:From what I have read and understand, Katzenberg is either no longer with DreamWorks or is now just with DreamWorks Animation (distributed or owned by Paramount). I could be wrong, but I don't know.
Also a good point. I read somewhere that he was up to something else. Come to think of it, is Geffen still involved with Dreamworks? That was the trio that made up the SKG. Maybe they're just S now.
~ Caroline

[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v480/atoning_unifex/Caroline%20Gaia/tta.gif[/img]

Jacca5660
Submarine Voyage Captain
Submarine Voyage Captain
Posts: 6842
Joined: Jun Sun 25, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: Chattanooga Tn
Contact:

Re: Disney/Dreamworks Dream Deal Done

Post by Jacca5660 » Feb Thu 12, 2009 9:27 am

elizabethswann wrote:Try saying that ten times fast.

I came across a news thread about this topic over at Visions Fantastic (on of the other daily Disney sites I go through) and I found another link to it on a Blogspot entry.

http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/ ... -done.html

and
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/id ... PV20090209

What are your thoughts on this? I, personally, believe that Dreamworks doesn't need to distribute their non-animated movies through Disney. They've been doing a good job by themselves. Jumping the shark, anyone?
This seems to be more for Disney's benefit then Dreamworks. I don't understand or didn't realize that Spielberg and Disney had patched up their differences. Wasn't there a falling out during the Eisner ( :?: ) years? I didn't think Spielberg was that happy with Disney.

I can understand with the quality of Dreamworks productions and the recent downward trend of Touchstones productions why Disney would want to do this. It keeps going through my head that it must have been a great deal for Spielberg.
"Our dreams can come true - if we have the courage to pursue them" WED

"There's a fine prow on that steamer, let's climb aboard her!" Fireside

"You're off the map mateys..Here there be SeaMonsters!!"

The original "LICENSE MAYHEM MARAUDER!!ImageImage

Post Reply