yodiwan1 wrote:...i dont see things as sucking in the parks...everyone has their favorites and dislikes, thats what makes people different.
Starting around 15 years or so ago, there started to be a noticeable decline in quality. (Maybe you're not old enough to remember, and Disney is probably counting on that.) At first, it was pretty subtle, and most people who pointed it out were regarded as cranks and loons.
Then it started getting more pronounced with the closing of Mr. Toad and the horrible and insulting reformat of the Tiki Birds. Things got progressively worse (on the whole) for a while, until finally even Disney itself acknowledged the problem.
Now that they're aware of the problem, there have been a number of positive signs, but for every step forward, there seems to be at least one step back. I don't know if this is just all the bad ideas from before the change working their way through the system or if they're still going to be making bad decisions in the future. Time will tell, I guess.
You don't have to agree with the above, but there's been much discussion about it and I'd say it's the general consensus among those who pay close attention to such things, both inside and outside the company.
With regards to the Stitch attraction, I'm always a little disappointed with humor based on bodily functions (especially the dog sneezing on you in HISTA). Not that I don't sometimes find it funny, but it's just cheap. It's pretty hard to find a children's film these days without at least one gaseous expulsion.
Ebert mentioned a while ago that if your film's big laugh involves a collision with a pile of manure, your movie is probably in trouble.
That said, I've read before that Walt used to give his animators an extra few bucks if they wrote a gag that made him laugh. The animators figured out that any time a character got whacked in the butt with something, Uncle Walt would chuckle, which is why Pluto is constantly taking such abuse.
Nice to know that Walt has his sociopathic tendencies too!