Good point...jlpeaches255 wrote:But would the old Tiki Room bring in the crowds like the new one does, oh wait, there really aren't crowds there, are there??
...but the change back is JUST A RUMOR! It has NOT been confirmed!
Moderator: Moderators
Good point...jlpeaches255 wrote:But would the old Tiki Room bring in the crowds like the new one does, oh wait, there really aren't crowds there, are there??
Sure, why not? With the audio all digital now, how difficult would it truly be to make an identical copy of DL's version audio and re-program the animatronics?NaCler wrote:But it's a very believable rumor, mindflipper. It makes sense and would save them money in the long run and that's what's they love. Purchasing another Iago would probably cost a bit more than removing Zazoo/Tiki Goddess from the show.
Because of the pre-show AAs (if you can call it that), and to prevent some idiot kid (or a kid of idiot parents, either or...) from walking into what is essentially a construction zone. CMs at the entrance can only do so much.NaCler wrote:But why would they need construction walls up if they are just removing AA's from the inside?
Usual Disney SOP; they don't want people like us snapping pics with iphones of what's going on. If something is being removed, they wouldn't want it to be known until the PR people decide when to tell the public.NaCler wrote:But why would they need construction walls up if they are just removing AA's from the inside?
Did they have to close it after the fire? They might just not have walls up yet. It isn't supposed to be back open until May right?MmeLeota wrote:It's odd that there aren't walls up if the attraction is already closed.
Not if any work they have to do because of the fire is not in any guest areas (above the show itself).MmeLeota wrote:It's odd that there aren't walls up if the attraction is already closed.
It has been closed since the day the fire happened. All I've seen is a lone CM at the entrance to TR:UNM telling guests it is closed. And from what I've read/heard it's supposed to open June 1st. Like I said before the opening date is subject to change.Amy wrote:Did they have to close it after the fire? They might just not have walls up yet. It isn't supposed to be back open until May right?
Well, then they have plenty of time to work above the attraction without construction walls, and if they truly are restoring the ETR without the "new management" then they could do that work later...with walls.MadEye wrote:Not if any work they have to do because of the fire is not in any guest areas (above the show itself).MmeLeota wrote:It's odd that there aren't walls up if the attraction is already closed.It has been closed since the day the fire happened. All I've seen is a lone CM at the entrance to TR:UNM telling guests it is closed. And from what I've read/heard it's supposed to open June 1st. Like I said before the opening date is subject to change.Amy wrote:Did they have to close it after the fire? They might just not have walls up yet. It isn't supposed to be back open until May right?
That's my thinking too. I'm surprised that they didn't put walls up anyhow. In DL, anytime any attraction is closed for an extended period for whatever reason, there are walls up. Even if there is no major work going on.Amy wrote:Well, then they have plenty of time to work above the attraction without construction walls, and if they truly are restoring the ETR without the "new management" then they could do that work later...with walls.MadEye wrote:Not if any work they have to do because of the fire is not in any guest areas (above the show itself).MmeLeota wrote:It's odd that there aren't walls up if the attraction is already closed.It has been closed since the day the fire happened. All I've seen is a lone CM at the entrance to TR:UNM telling guests it is closed. And from what I've read/heard it's supposed to open June 1st. Like I said before the opening date is subject to change.Amy wrote:Did they have to close it after the fire? They might just not have walls up yet. It isn't supposed to be back open until May right?
I never thought about it but I would think they must have some very good insurance. And it probably is some sort of self-insurance because you are right, those premiums would be out of this worldmindflipper wrote:Out of curiosity: does anyone know if Disney carries property insurance on WDW? You would think it, but the premiums would have to be a scarey number so I just assumed maybe they're self-insured?