Either they really believe that "nobody will look", or they figure once they drop something off the map and out of the guidebook, not enough people will realize there's anything still there to notice.
The idea behind this thread, then, is:
with the theory being that people who are interested in Disney enough to look up internet forums like this one might just be interested enough to see some of the vestiges of the past. The idea, I might add, is not to encourage anyone to get cited for trespassing, so we're not looking for maps to 'offstage' or ways to circumvent security. Ideally, we're looking to 'out' bad show. The four tenets for cast members in the parks (so I've been told) are Safety, Courtesy, Show, Efficiency - in that order. Maybe leaving River Country to rot is 'efficient' (maybe), but shouldn't the Show still be more important?napastoy wrote:Maybe calling unwanted attention to the areas so that people DO LOOK would cause them to re-think the "leave and neglect" method.
This discussion is open to anyone - feel free to contribute if you can think of something in or around the parks that you know isn't "neat and pretty" but the powers that be leave lying in plain view anyway. Pictures are welcome; I know there are a lot of them out there. Perhaps the more we can call attention to - the more people on the boats between Fort Wilderness and the Magic Kingdom who ask "Hey, what's that heap of rubble over there?" - the more likely we are to compel them to change.
If not, then at least we'll have an interesting collection of park-eology.
-----
I figure I'll get things started with a link back to the Creepy Pop Century video I posted a while back. This is in plain view of anyone staying at the finished side of Pop Century. I wonder if anyone ever asks at the front desk "What the heck is that bombed-out looking building over there??"