Disney faced with lawsuit in Mission: Space death

All four parks, waterparks, and other magic in Central Florida

Moderator: Moderators

AKLRULZ
PeopleMover People Mover
PeopleMover People Mover
Posts: 1567
Joined: Nov Thu 04, 2004 8:19 am
Location: Virginia

Disney faced with lawsuit in Mission: Space death

Post by AKLRULZ » Jun Wed 14, 2006 6:24 am

This infuriates me! :twisted: I'd like to think that unless severe negligence was involved that if I lost a family member under any circumstances that I'd have the dignity and class to move on in life rather than filing a frivilous lawsuit with a company that has hugely deep pockets. It's actaully hilarious that they claim that improper warnings and the child's size contributed to his death given that neither of those things are remotely true. :x I'm very sorry this child died, but it's almost equally sad the way the family is now reacting one year later and I've personally lost respect for them.
One year after a 4-year-old Pennsylvania boy died after riding Epcot's Mission: Space simulator ride, his family has sued Walt Disney World for wrongful death.

The family of Daudi Bamuwamye sued the company Tuesday in Orange County Circuit Court seeking unspecified damages. They say company officials didn't adequately warn the public of the ride's hazards, should never have allowed a boy so small onto the ride, and didn't do enough to help him when he got off unconscious and stricken.

"They are exposing the general public to a ride whose forces they don't really understand," said Tampa attorney Robert A. Samartin, who is representing Daudi's parents, Moses and Agnes Bamuwamye of Sellersville, Pa.

Mission: Space spins riders inside a mock spaceship, using centrifugal force, other physical motion, video and audio to simulate a trip to Mars. The ride opened in the summer of 2003 and Disney has said more than 11 million people have been on it.

In April, a second person died after riding the attraction, a 49-year-old German woman named Hiltrud Blümel. At least another 10 have been hospitalized and at least another 130 have been treated at the scene for illnesses.

In May Disney revised the ride to offer a "lite" version that does not include centrifugal force. But the company has always maintained, and still insists, that the original version is safe.

A Disney spokeswoman denied all the assertions in the suit Tuesday and offered the family sympathy.

While on vacation, Daudi, his sister Ruth, and their mother rode Mission: Space on June 13, 2005. During the ride, Agnes Bamuwamye saw her son tense up, scream and then become unresponsive. When the ride ended, paramedics and later doctors at Florida Hospital Celebration were unable to resuscitate him.

An autopsy by Dr. Jan. C. Garavaglia, chief medical examiner for the district that includes Orange and Osceola counties, found that Daudi died of a heart attack caused by a previously undiagnosed, rare heart disease that gave him an enlarged heart flawed with scar tissue.

Another autopsy is pending for Blümel, though a preliminary report said she had severe high blood pressure and died of a stroke.

The Bamuwamye family was marking the anniversary of Daudi's death Wednesday in quiet solitude and was unavailable to comment, Samartin said.

"They are struggling. They have a surviving daughter and they are forging ahead. They are people of deep faith. That helps them," he said. "But it's a day-to-day struggle.

Disney spokeswoman Jacquee Polak called his death "a terrible loss to his loved ones. We sympathize with them. However, we disagree with the assertions of the lawsuit."

The Bamuwamye suit accuses Disney of not doing anything to modify the ride or adequately warn the public of danger even though many people have sought emergency medical attention since the ride's inception.

The family also faults Disney for allowing 44-inch children on the ride, when one national standard, suggested by the American Society for Testing and Materials, calls for a 48-inch minimum for rides of high acceleration. Daudi was 46 inches tall.

And the Bamuwamyes complain that Disney paramedics did not use a portable defibrillator on him. They say Disney boasts, in promotional materials, of having portable defibrillators throughout its theme parks, and 4,000 employees trained to use them.

"We're pretty confident it would have given this kid a chance, and possibly saved his life," Samartin said.

Polak acknowledged that there was no portable defibrillator stationed at Mission: Space. But she said well-trained, well-equipped paramedics handled the emergency response appropriately. She also said the 44-inch height is appropriate for the ride, and that Disney has no reason to change the ride or public warnings that are delivered through multiple signs and audio and video media. They warn, among other things, that people with heart conditions or high blood pressure should not ride.

"We believe the attraction is safe," she said.

LINK
Steve Baker ~ Travel Consultant :mickey3:
Steve.Baker@themagicforless.com
Affiliated with The Magic for Less
www.themagicforless.com

[url=http://ubanimator.com][img]http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/4199/userbar517512ps8.gif[/img][/url]

iloverags2
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Posts: 60
Joined: Jun Sat 03, 2006 2:14 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Post by iloverags2 » Jun Wed 14, 2006 6:47 am

I absolutely couldn't agree more with you. My husband talked often about what we would do in circumstances like this, and both of us agree...lawsuits are just a way for people to make a quick buck off a tragedy. What a shame people feel the need to exploit large companies. While I feel terrible a young boy has died, people just need to face the reality there are plenty of warnings regarding the ride. Interesting how this family waited until Disney toned down the ride (not the entire thing, but the optional less intense ride) so they can use that against them. One of those, "Disney must agree it's not safe if they created a toned-down version" things.
Cindy

GoofyInOhio
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Posts: 309
Joined: Jul Thu 28, 2005 7:39 pm
Location: Buckeye Country

Post by GoofyInOhio » Jun Wed 14, 2006 7:06 am

I'm very sadened by this families loss. :( People seem to sue over just about everything though. If Disney wasn't at fault I'm not sure what the argument would be here.
Bloody Pirate!

AKLRULZ
PeopleMover People Mover
PeopleMover People Mover
Posts: 1567
Joined: Nov Thu 04, 2004 8:19 am
Location: Virginia

Post by AKLRULZ » Jun Wed 14, 2006 7:41 am

GoofyInOhio wrote:If Disney wasn't at fault I'm not sure what the argument would be here.
Thing is, Goof, it wasn't Disney's fault. It wasn't anyone's fault. The child had a defect in his heart that no one knew about until his autopsy. Maybe had he not ridden MS he'd have died later in life in another extreme situation like atheletes sometimes do - we'll obviously never know. It was a tragedy with no blame. :(
Steve Baker ~ Travel Consultant :mickey3:
Steve.Baker@themagicforless.com
Affiliated with The Magic for Less
www.themagicforless.com

[url=http://ubanimator.com][img]http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/4199/userbar517512ps8.gif[/img][/url]

rdeacon
Santa Fe & Disneyland Railroad Engineer
Santa Fe & Disneyland Railroad Engineer
Posts: 2153
Joined: Jun Mon 28, 2004 11:50 am
Location: Winter Springs, FL
Contact:

Post by rdeacon » Jun Wed 14, 2006 8:20 am

AKLRULZ...

This is just a sad fact of our sue happy society. If some one can sue McDonalds ( and win! ) for not knowing the coffee is hot and they should be cautious and not spill it on themselves, then people will sue for anything. I guarantee as soon as it happened lawyers were beating down the family door to get them to sue. I would blame the lawyers more the family, but both are to blame. Sure Disney has a team of lawyers for just this type if thing. Sure it’s not the first time and won't be the last. :(


Rich
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible.."
Walt Disney

[img]http://www.rdeacon.com/img/banners/bar/SR_admin_adv.jpg[/img]
[img]http://rdeacon.com/img/banners/bar/SR_monkey_adv.jpg[/img]

bamafan19
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Posts: 63
Joined: May Fri 05, 2006 9:36 am

Post by bamafan19 » Jun Wed 14, 2006 8:28 am

One thing Disney CANNOT be guilty of is inadequate warnings. They let you know at every turn the magnitude of this ride.

:mickey3:

GoofyInOhio
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Posts: 309
Joined: Jul Thu 28, 2005 7:39 pm
Location: Buckeye Country

Post by GoofyInOhio » Jun Wed 14, 2006 8:46 am

AKLRULZ wrote:
GoofyInOhio wrote:If Disney wasn't at fault I'm not sure what the argument would be here.
Thing is, Goof, it wasn't Disney's fault. It wasn't anyone's fault. The child had a defect in his heart that no one knew about until his autopsy. Maybe had he not ridden MS he'd have died later in life in another extreme situation like atheletes sometimes do - we'll obviously never know. It was a tragedy with no blame. :(
Yeah I know. That's what I mean Disney didn't do anything wrong here so I don't understand the Lawsuit.
Bloody Pirate!

SimonTemplar
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Posts: 325
Joined: Mar Mon 27, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Main Street USA

Post by SimonTemplar » Jun Wed 14, 2006 9:40 am

I too am saddened by this family's loss. However, it's also a sad commentary on today's lawsuit-happy society. I believe without a doubt that Disney does a very thorough job of posting the warnings for their thrill rides. As was pointed out above by AKLRULZ, this child could have easliy died later in life as a result of the same heart aliment. Some things cannot be helped or foreseen, which does not automatically mean that blame should be posted on anyone or anything.

:evil:

:mickey:
"Here in Florida, we have something special we never enjoyed at Disneyland...the blessing of size. There's enough land here to hold all the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine." ~ Walt Disney

foldmama
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain
Posts: 347
Joined: Nov Thu 03, 2005 3:56 pm
Location: Yorktown Heights, NY

Post by foldmama » Jun Wed 14, 2006 10:41 am

I totally agree with all of you. I am also saddened by this family's loss, but the truth is Disney is not at fault.

My nephew was 8.5 years old the last time he was at Disney and he has never been on MS, ToT or R@RC. My sister-in-law felt that he was too young for such intense rides. I have seen so many parents bring really young kids onto rides that are not age appropriate because they want to experience the ride themselves.

It just makes me so mad that people sue a company when the truth is they need to take more responsibility for the decision they make regarding their children. Disney has more warnings then any theme park I have ever visited.

When they first started building MS, I was so excited. When it was finished and I went to ride I decided not to because of my Asthma. I have never been on MS because I am afraid of having an asthma attack! People need to use their brains.

It's not Disney fault that this child has an unknow heart defect.

Mr.ToadWildRider
Flight to the Moon Flight Director
Flight to the Moon Flight Director
Posts: 1185
Joined: Apr Thu 13, 2006 2:25 pm
Location: No where in particular (okay...Massachusetts)

Post by Mr.ToadWildRider » Jun Wed 14, 2006 12:14 pm

I guess the numerous signs and repeated warnings throughout pre-show videos (although they have increased since the death they were always there and numerous) isn't enough to warn people? Also, the claim that a defibwasn't used is so wrong - they didn't know he had a heart problem until after the autopsy....hello? Defibrillators are extremely dangerous if used in error (they can induce heart attack if your heart is functioning normally when used...) and they had no way to know it was a heart related issue; if CMs DID use the device and it WASN'T a heart problem then they would have a legitimate law suit on their hands. I sympathize with the family for the loss but to try to profit from it is heartless.

Club33Hopeful
Shooting Galleries Gun Cleaner
Shooting Galleries Gun Cleaner
Posts: 628
Joined: Apr Sun 24, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Somewhere

Post by Club33Hopeful » Jun Wed 14, 2006 1:49 pm

rdeacon wrote:This is just a sad fact of our sue happy society. If some one can sue McDonalds ( and win! ) for not knowing the coffee is hot and they should be cautious and not spill it on themselves, then people will sue for anything. I guarantee as soon as it happened lawyers were beating down the family door to get them to sue. I would blame the lawyers more the family, but both are to blame. Sure Disney has a team of lawyers for just this type if thing. Sure it’s not the first time and won't be the last.
Hmmm.

Well, a lot of distortions were made in the media about this case in particular, and it has somewhat turned into an urban legend. If you look at the particulars of the McDonald's Coffee case, it seems like Stella Liebeck was well within her rights to sue, and was justified in doing so. If it were not for Stella's actions, who knows how many more accidents would have happened at McDonald's. Look at the facts:

Stella Liebeck, 79, suffered third degree burns on her inner thighs and groin while adding sugar to her coffee at the drive-up window. Third degree burns are the most serious kind of burn. McDonalds knew it had a problem. There were at least 700 previous cases of scalding coffee incidents at McDonalds before Liebeck's case. McDonalds had settled many claim before but refused Liebeck's request for $20,000 compensation, forcing the case into court. Lawyers found that McDonalds makes its coffee 30-50 degrees hotter than other restaurants, about 190 degrees. Doctors testified that it only takes 2-7 seconds to cause a third degree burn at 190 degrees. McDonalds knew its coffee was exceptionally hot but testified that they had never consulted with burn specialist. The Shriner Burn Institute had previously warned McDonalds not to serve coffee above 130 degrees. And so the jury came back with a decision- $160,000 for compensatory damages. But because McDonalds was guilty of "willful, reckless, malicious or wanton conduct" punitive damages were also applied. The jury set the award at $2.7 million. The judge then reduced the fine to less than half a million. Ms. Liebeck then settled with McDonalds for a sum reported to be much less than a half million dollars. McDonald's coffee is now sold at the same temperature as most other restaurants.
-Club33Hopeful

spaulo
PeopleMover People Mover
PeopleMover People Mover
Posts: 1622
Joined: Dec Mon 06, 2004 7:25 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Contact:

Post by spaulo » Jun Wed 14, 2006 2:01 pm

Whether or not this lawsuit has merit will be decided in a court of law. We're all a little quick to judge here, don't you think?

When big corporations do screw up, you have to tell them so in their language... and all they speak is green.
~Steve

jrcohen
Peter Pan's Flight Pixie Duster
Peter Pan's Flight Pixie Duster
Posts: 520
Joined: Apr Thu 07, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by jrcohen » Jun Wed 14, 2006 2:33 pm

I think Foldmama is right. What this comes down to is responsibility. And Parents need to be responsible for their kids. The fact that Disney does warn you over and over again during pre-flight on mission space, maybe should've tipped off the parents that maybe even though their 4-year old son is tall enough to ride, it'd be best for him to sit this one out. I understand that the parents didn't know their son had a heat condition, and I'm not saying it's their fault their child is gone, but I do believe that society is telling them that someone has to be at fault. When ever a child dies, I do believe society believes that it doesn't just happen, someone must be responsible for the death. And like Rich said, I'm sure the tort lawyers were all too happy to try to get a piece of Disney. I don't think it would take too much convincing from the many lawyers that were approaching the grief-stricken parents of this child that Disney should be responsible for their son's death. Especially if either parent had the slightest thought beforehand that their son should not have ridden MS.
Please keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Thank you, and enjoy the rest of your day here at Walt Disney World.

bamafan19
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Casey Junior Circus Train Conductor
Posts: 63
Joined: May Fri 05, 2006 9:36 am

Post by bamafan19 » Jun Wed 14, 2006 3:03 pm

Club33Hopeful wrote:
rdeacon wrote:This is just a sad fact of our sue happy society. If some one can sue McDonalds ( and win! ) for not knowing the coffee is hot and they should be cautious and not spill it on themselves, then people will sue for anything. I guarantee as soon as it happened lawyers were beating down the family door to get them to sue. I would blame the lawyers more the family, but both are to blame. Sure Disney has a team of lawyers for just this type if thing. Sure it’s not the first time and won't be the last.
Hmmm.

Well, a lot of distortions were made in the media about this case in particular, and it has somewhat turned into an urban legend. If you look at the particulars of the McDonald's Coffee case, it seems like Stella Liebeck was well within her rights to sue, and was justified in doing so. If it were not for Stella's actions, who knows how many more accidents would have happened at McDonald's. Look at the facts:

Stella Liebeck, 79, suffered third degree burns on her inner thighs and groin while adding sugar to her coffee at the drive-up window. Third degree burns are the most serious kind of burn. McDonalds knew it had a problem. There were at least 700 previous cases of scalding coffee incidents at McDonalds before Liebeck's case. McDonalds had settled many claim before but refused Liebeck's request for $20,000 compensation, forcing the case into court. Lawyers found that McDonalds makes its coffee 30-50 degrees hotter than other restaurants, about 190 degrees. Doctors testified that it only takes 2-7 seconds to cause a third degree burn at 190 degrees. McDonalds knew its coffee was exceptionally hot but testified that they had never consulted with burn specialist. The Shriner Burn Institute had previously warned McDonalds not to serve coffee above 130 degrees. And so the jury came back with a decision- $160,000 for compensatory damages. But because McDonalds was guilty of "willful, reckless, malicious or wanton conduct" punitive damages were also applied. The jury set the award at $2.7 million. The judge then reduced the fine to less than half a million. Ms. Liebeck then settled with McDonalds for a sum reported to be much less than a half million dollars. McDonald's coffee is now sold at the same temperature as most other restaurants.
I know this is off-subject, but the fact that she was holding HOT coffee any where near her groin area should have thrown the whole case out on stupidity.

:mickey3:

Club33Hopeful
Shooting Galleries Gun Cleaner
Shooting Galleries Gun Cleaner
Posts: 628
Joined: Apr Sun 24, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Somewhere

Post by Club33Hopeful » Jun Wed 14, 2006 3:27 pm

bamafan19 wrote:I know this is off-subject, but the fact that she was holding HOT coffee any where near her groin area should have thrown the whole case out on stupidity.

:mickey3:
:(

Had they heeded warnings, and the 700 previous complaints, it would have been a non-issue. Coffee at a normal temperature will not cause third degree burns, even if you dump the whole cup in your lap. When I go to starbucks, I place the cup in my lap because I have no cup holders. I have spilled coffee in my lap before, and I would be really upset if my starbucks was at 190 degrees. There is simply no need to have it that hot, and it is neglegent in light of all of the previous incidents to continue to serve it that hot.
-Club33Hopeful

Post Reply