I agree. This is one of those chicken-and-egg scenarios. AK doesn't have enough, so we don't go and spend money. Because it doesn't make enough money, TDO doesn't want to expand it. Because TDO doesn't want to expand it, we don't go and spend money. Etc, etc, etc. So, someone has to blink first...and in this case it is going to have to be TDO. Fan's aren't going to support a park that isn't finished, and we aren't going to be happy with the small selection of rides/attractions, especially rides that need maintenance. Your point is dead right. They can't take down the rides they have, because there isn't enough to fill capacity. At least EPCOT had Horizons still available when UoE and WoM went down for their major conversions in the 90s. Additionally, AK needs a classic-style dark ride. An omnimover, something relaxing that has large capacity. Dinosaur is cool, but definitely not relaxing.Future Guy wrote:Animal Kingdom is an unfinished park. And because it's unfinished, TDO can't afford to take down Everest or Dinosaur for maintenance and rehabs because of the serious capacity issues that would cause. Disney obviously doesn't feel that Animal Kingdom is worth spending money on, and until they change their mind I don't see why it's worth it for me to spend my money there, either.
I really want to really like AK, but like many others, it is my 4th choice of parks I visit, and if I have to leave one out during my trip, it is AK...