Few 128k, More 94k, or Many 64k Streams?

Post by **subsonic** » Jan Wed 11, 2006 1:31 pm

Would you folks rather have some 128k streams, many 64k streams, or split is and get a medium amount of 96k streams?

Only about 40% of my content is actually 128k quality. So if a track I have comes up that is 24k even if you're listening on the 128k stream it'll still sound like 24k.

I'm curious about what you all would rather see.

I'm making a poll as well.

Post by **Dr. Ravenscroft** » Jan Wed 11, 2006 1:50 pm

I like the 128 streams because some of the songs are too distorted when they have lower streams. Like the Hallowishes Fireworks, the bass is overdriven at 64k.

Post by **Dr. Ravenscroft** » Jan Wed 11, 2006 10:51 pm

OK I have been listening to the station for about an hour and I haven't heard any difference in the quality. But ofcourse I wasn't listening to the more Bassie songs so I will wait until I have more points to listen to one.

Dr. G · Post by **Dr. G** » Jan Thu 12, 2006 11:22 am

Subsonic: I'm okay with whatever works for you and the bandwidth. Since I mostly listen at work, the connection doesn't make too much of a difference through the laptop. The only time I notice a difference is if no one else is in the office and I can run the sound through my stereo speakers rather than the laptop's. I think the 96k seems to be a good middle road. It looks like there are usually connections available, which is great (when I'm on my old laptop--new one still is not a happy camper).

Thanks for a great station!

Disneynut · Post by **Disneynut** » Jan Sat 14, 2006 10:20 am

I think the 96k stream sounds fine. Also I appreciate the fact that the 96k stream doesn't include that cheesy subsonic intro.

AlexLoup · Post by **AlexLoup** » Jan Sat 14, 2006 1:50 pm

The 96K is fine, it sounds like a 128K (to me at least.) My winamp doesn't go into mono.

Post by **Dr. Ravenscroft** » Jan Sat 14, 2006 2:41 pm

OK now I have to say it is completely fine at 96k. Sorry to hear about the 128k going down. If we that aswell there would be a lot of space to listen.

Post by **subsonic** » Jan Mon 16, 2006 1:01 pm

Disneynut wrote:I think the 96k stream sounds fine. Also I appreciate the fact that the 96k stream doesn't include that cheesy subsonic intro.

Aww, I made that
And I need to get a 96k one to give to Addelma.

It's going to go back in

eagle4life69 · Post by **eagle4life69** » Jan Mon 16, 2006 3:12 pm

I love the cheesy intro it is so cool. Sub you did a great job on it

Dr. G · Post by **Dr. G** » Jan Mon 16, 2006 3:55 pm

I enjoy all the clips at the beginning and inbetween songs--good job!

Post by **addlema** » Jan Tue 17, 2006 7:23 am

I do too.. the intro and the kids in the middle are great! I wish we had more.. I wish my son wasnt -4 months or id try to make some cool ones..

I saw the 96k's topped out at max listeners a few days last week.. Hmm i may have to add a few more

QuickGold · Post by **QuickGold** » Jan Tue 17, 2006 10:03 am

I'd prefer 128k but if it's busy all the time I'd rather have more 96k

cruiseguy7011 · Post by **cruiseguy7011** » Jan Tue 17, 2006 11:20 pm

QuickGold wrote:I'd prefer 128k but if it's busy all the time I'd rather have more 96k

That's why i chose more 96k's

zenmondo · Post by **zenmondo** » Jan Wed 18, 2006 1:48 pm

For the record I like the cheesy intro.

Disneynut · Post by **Disneynut** » Jan Wed 18, 2006 2:27 pm

zenmondo wrote:For the record I like the cheesy intro.

Just for the record there are no points given to suck ups.

Subsonic Radio

Few 128k, More 94k, or Many 64k Streams?

Few 128k, More 96k, or Many 64k

Few 128k, More 94k, or Many 64k Streams?