Len90 wrote:Wizzard and Future Guy I actually like the different angles both are bringing to this topic. I do think Future Guy that you are being a bit too quick in calling for 20-30 minute waits for SSE and TGMR. IF the wrist bands are to replace fastpass completely then I don't think we will be seeing just yet any sort of issues for low wait attractions. After all, I really don't think anyone is going to be jumping online to schedule their ride on Mad Tea Party or TGMR. Even still something like TGMR, which if busy will run two shows can then easily split to a reserved fastpass show vehicle and the standby show vehicle. We definitely will have to wait and see on this before jumping to any conclusions.
If Disney will be placing emphasis on hotel levels with the wristbands, then it looks like the RFID system will have to assign you numbers upon payment or something so you will be able to book your attractions. RFID chips will then also have to be programmed for the bracelets to then coincide. However, I would like to hope this is just rumor and will not be the case as it will create some interesting arguments at Guest Services. People are still paying the same price for the theme park experiences. If Disney is to offer any difference of service for where you stay it would have to be at the actual resort location or with your transportation to the parks.
As for the maintenance, I have to agree completely with Future Guy. TDO has consistently (since the Eisner era) been lackluster in maintenance. The yeti, to me, is a huge failure in the imagineering department. It shows how they never thought about the physics involved with the movements of the yeti and the force it will have on the foundation. It really does have an impact on the attraction. As Future Guy stated, Maelstrom has not seen any TLC in years. It honestly looks aged and rundown. I went on it during EMH and it really was almost like walking through the Haunted Mansion, expect the neglect is done on purpose for the Haunted Mansion. Yes costs for park operations have gone up, but Disney has consistently offset those cost increases by passing it on to the guests. Whether it is an admission price increase, parking fee increase, or hotel rate increase, Disney has offset rising costs. For fiscal year 2012, Disney Parks category saw an increase in operating profit jumped 22% to 1.9 billion and operating revenue was up 10% to 12.9 billion. Yes that does not single out WDW, and yes WDW did actually see a slight decrease in attendance. However, it was offset in the numbers by the opening of Cars land and the reopening of California Adventure. To me this shows that if Disney invests money in creating NEW attractions, new shows, and removing dead ends they can manage to show healthy gains in both revenue and profit.
They probably will not be scrapping the old system since not all guests are staying on property and dumbphones still hold a significant share of the market, plus international guests may not be able to use the apps if disney doesn't have ROW versions, etc.
Even before this system, you had your guest IDs for everyone in the party made up right when you booked since you already told them how many people were in the party, how many tickets, etc. If they had to build a new bracelet for each guest it would be too expensive, they most likely will just link a bracelet to a guest when they arrive (or before if they use the express) where that number will be the key for the room, payment, etc.
Yes they should remove old, tired, and unpopular attractions, like CoP

, but at the same time WDW has a different customer base than DLR. At WDW, due to the expense and the simply massive size of the resort, normal guests will not return as frequently (or ever in some cases). At DLR there is a heavy local element that visits the park at least once a year, so it makes sense to have more updates for guests that come back more.