IMFearless wrote:If you have an attraction where people actually begin BOOING, you know something's wrong. Yet, since Dubya was added, I generally heard boos throughout the audience. That's bad. As is, Disney is strongly considering not letting the new addition to the show have a speaking part. So this doesn't happen again.
They do that in the 'interim' when they're getting the new president made, right? (Er.. the new animatronic. There's a conspiracy theory for you ... Disney building the president
). I remember when ... I'm gonna guess ClintonAA was being built, they were back to letting Lincoln talk a lot more. I can't say as I think that's a bad idea, to keep it that way.
The last time I was there was 2005, so Monsters wasn't open yet. I'm surprised people here don't like it, I heard it was a good show.
We've bludgeoned this repeatedly in numerous threads, but on behalf of the 'haters', it's really the location of the attraction most people seem to have a beef with. I didn't hate the attraction itself (though I found the animation kinda sub-par in some parts). It's not really a bad idea; it's just in a bad place.
Captain Schnemo wrote:This could be great, if it were actually about the presidents.
They should hire Doris Kearns Goodwin and make the darn thing entertaining instead of a lecture about civil rights that most people already know, painted in such broad strokes as to make a really interesting topic pretty bland.
I have a version from.. 1971, so it claims ... on my iPod where you actually learn some things about presidents - principally Washington and Jackson. Okay, well, I learned some things. Maybe it's stuff that's covered in US middle schools. In any case, it's interesting how the show sort of morphed to become more PC over the years and more boring at the same time (though not really surprising, maybe).
