How Dangerous is Mission Space?

rudekick · Post by **rudekick** » May Mon 08, 2006 6:50 pm

This post is way too similar to the format of the FINAL LAW SCHOOL EXAM I EVER HAVE TO TAKE, which will happen tomorrow.

FlatlandMounty · Post by **FlatlandMounty** » May Mon 08, 2006 7:12 pm

What? If that's the case, how do they grade your exam? Do they give you examples of cases and say, "How against the law is this on a scale of 1-10?" I'm not trying to be sarcastic. You've got me really curious as to the format of your test.

rudekick · Post by **rudekick** » May Mon 08, 2006 7:17 pm

LOL. No. I was writing that in reference to horizons1's post. Sorry - gotta remember the quote button next time!

Post by **js3901** » May Mon 08, 2006 7:27 pm

FlatlandMounty wrote:What? If that's the case, how do they grade your exam? Do they give you examples of cases and say, "How against the law is this on a scale of 1-10?" I'm not trying to be sarcastic. You've got me really curious as to the format of your test.

I believe rudekick means Horizons1 post right before...

and in response to Horizons1, I don;t think that Disney has any responsibility for people complacency (sp?) towards anything Disney. Disney (and especially Disney parks) are all about changes. If there's one thing I've learned from being in Customer service for the last 10 years it's this - doesn;t matter how many warning of whatever size, shape, colors, or shaping, people will ignore them as they become complacent. but, so long as they are there, people can;t sue saying they weren;t warned. same thing with anything that has warning labels (lighterfluid, aerosol cans, etc).

Post by **horizons1** » May Tue 09, 2006 1:35 pm

js3901 wrote:If there's one thing I've learned from being in Customer service for the last 10 years it's this - doesn;t matter how many warning of whatever size, shape, colors, or shaping, people will ignore them as they become complacent. but, so long as they are there, people can;t sue saying they weren;t warned. same thing with anything that has warning labels (lighterfluid, aerosol cans, etc).

I tend to agree with you. But this whole discussion got me thinking about how synonymous the word Disney is with "family" (it's almost like ohana!) And all those warm fuzzies someone gets when they think of Disney must play into a sense of security. Or call it complacency. Same net effect.

Post by **horizons1** » May Tue 09, 2006 1:36 pm

rudekick wrote:This post is way too similar to the format of the FINAL LAW SCHOOL EXAM I EVER HAVE TO TAKE, which will happen tomorrow.

BTW, rudekick, I hope you pass. Wouldn't it be more fun to take a final where WDW was the topic?!

FlatlandMounty · Post by **FlatlandMounty** » May Tue 09, 2006 3:27 pm

Yeah good luck with that exam. Where are you going to law school? I got a buddy who is headed for Harvard Law this fall.

PS
I like how this post is slowly turning into a law school stress relief post.

rudekick · Post by **rudekick** » May Tue 09, 2006 5:21 pm

FlatlandMounty wrote:Yeah good luck with that exam. Where are you going to law school? I got a buddy who is headed for Harvard Law this fall.

PS
I like how this post is slowly turning into a law school stress relief post.

Nice, I just finished up at Harvard. If he/she has any questions, send me a private message.

Post by **horizons1** » May Tue 09, 2006 7:28 pm

It could actually become a case study for discussion in a Bus Law course.

kgmadorin · Post by **kgmadorin** » May Thu 18, 2006 2:24 pm

Just to follow up on this discussion which I bowed out of so long ago, I'd like to applaud Disney on their decision to offer two separate experiences. Please see the following info from wdwmagic.com:

As previously announced, there will be two Mission: SPACE experiences, Orange Team (spinning high G version as before) and Green Team (non-spinning mild version). The current Standby entrance will become Orange Standby, with the current Singles entrance becoming Green Standby. Before anyone can enter the building they will need to have an orange or green pass, which will have to be presented at the end of the line. This pass will ensure that the rider has chosen the correct ride version, and should help to reduce confusion.

The new version is set to be available to guests this Friday.

The official press release:

LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. (May 2, 2006) -- By the beginning of summer, Epcot guests will have two options when it comes to riding Mission: SPACE -- the original thrill attraction and a new version for those who prefer a milder ride experience.

The new version, which is created by turning off the spinning centrifuge, may be more suited for some guests, such as those who are prone to motion sickness or have other conditions. Both versions will offer an exciting astronaut training experience through a dramatic story that invites guests to explore a new world.

"By offering a second adventure, we hope to broaden the appeal of Mission: SPACE and enable even more guests to experience the attraction," said Al Weiss, president of Walt Disney World Resort.

Signs posted in the queue area of Mission: SPACE will outline the difference between the two adventures and provide health advisories appropriate for each experience.

"Providing a choice between two ride options will help to further encourage all guests to carefully consider posted health advisories when making their decision," added Weiss.

Mission: SPACE opened in August 2003. Since that time, 11.8 million rides have been given on the attraction, which simulates the launch, approach and landing of a futuristic spacecraft on Mars. The attraction is made up of four separate ride systems, each with its own centrifuge and programmable simulators.

FlatlandMounty · Post by **FlatlandMounty** » May Thu 18, 2006 2:46 pm

yes...exactly...the new modifcations, while not perfect, are the best solution right now. I'll bet that imagineers are even looking for something BETTER!

SimonTemplar · Post by **SimonTemplar** » Jun Fri 02, 2006 9:32 am

You know, I think this just comes down to reading the "warning signs" and using common sense. Most, if not all, of this tragedies have been found to be the result of pre-existing health conditions. If you've had heart issues, etc. in the past, then you probably should forego that particular ride. My 9 year old son has no health issues whatsoever, but I wouldn't let him ride it this summer. It's so intense, and I wouldn't want that to be the way we discovered something was wrong.

DisneyManInSeattle · Post by **DisneyManInSeattle** » Jun Fri 02, 2006 1:11 pm

I agree with others here -- understanding the normal warning signs and use common sense. That said, there is that umbrella of "pre-existing conditions" issue -- you might know that you have X, but being exposed to a few G's can cause the X to manifest itself.

-mark

FlatlandMounty · Post by **FlatlandMounty** » Jun Sat 03, 2006 10:20 am

ok, so I rode the mild side of Mission space...and it was actually pretty cool. Now that there is an option for that....no one should be worried about the ride at all unless they are afraid of the dark, close spaces, or get motion sickness.

Captain Schnemo · Post by **Captain Schnemo** » Jun Sun 04, 2006 12:46 am

horizons1 wrote:Isn't it at least somewhat likely that the average Disney guest (not a "fan" or regular but the average joe) has an image of Disney rides as being on the tame side?

I think that's pretty reasonable. Probably wouldn't hold up in court or anything, but baseline legality shouldn't be the guiding force at a Disney park.

I think the ride just doesn't pass the basic philosophy of being a ride for everyone, which was the whole reason Disneyland was created.

Oh well.

Subsonic Radio

How Dangerous is Mission Space?

Scale of 1 to 10, how dangerous is Mission Space? (1=low :: 10=high)