acp wrote:Immature, or just poking fun at something that deserves it? Personally I find it hard to take a news outlet seriously when the lead story on their world news page is that a snake ate a dog. Surely there's more important things going on in the world?
Yes, like this
transgendered talk show host (taken from the "BBC World Service Highlights" section of the main page of the BBC World Service).
lebeau wrote:I found the original post came across as having an attitude of entitlement. Why would anyone be surprised to find Fox News isn't offered? There are lots of channels that are not offered. Not surprisingly, Disney packs the line-up with their own stations first.
The point was, that of (what I consider to be) the three major 24-hour US news networks (CNN, MSNBC, and FNC), FNC is the only one not offered. Talking about the rest of the channel lineup is irrelevant in the context of this post. The discussion is about why Disney carries two major 24-hour news networks and not all three. So far, the only person to suggest a rational explanation is DisBeamer...
So far, the suggested explanations for why it's not carried it are:
1) It's awful. -- That's a valid opinion, but it's not a reason why Disney wouldn't carry the FNC.
2) It's not a Disney-owned channel. -- Neither are CNN or MSNBC.
3) They don't have many channels on the lineup. -- If they are trying to keep the lineup short why bother with two 24-hour news networks? Why not just one?
4) Fox shows poke fun at Disney. -- Ridiculous. They carry the channels that play the aforementioned shows. Also, the new American Idol attraction is based on a Fox show.
5) They couldn't reach a deal to carry the network. -- Finally, a post that actually contributes to the discussion.
I wouldn't say anyone was being rude, but I don't see very much meaningful contribution to the discussion. The first three responses to the OP were people presenting opinions in a way that effectively mocked the OP...not very mature, if you ask me.
--FCOD