cy1229 wrote:
I didn't say it's not about the money, I said it's not only about the money. There's a responsibility to one's customers and employees.
Unless you're Carrier and you make air conditioning units, and you tell all your 1,000+ employees they're losing their jobs because their manufacturing is moving to Mexico, and you tell the government leaders that they will keep the factory open if they can pay their employees $6 an hour. Then it really is only about the money. I know Disney isn't ranked on the list of best employers for a lot of reasons, but they do a better job than Carrier did.
P. S. Don't buy a Carrier air conditioner, Amy.
I was responding more to other people and the usual comment that shows up about why disney theme parks came to be.
Anywho... while one could claim Disney maintains their responsibility towards their workers, they don't. In the semi-distant past, many of the park workers were union and could afford to live in OC. Then in the 80's, they broke them all up (some came back), now the notion of someone being able to live here on a park worker's salary is laughable.
Considering they have been on a pretty steady campaign of doing more with less labor, resulting in rides opening later in the day or not at all, having fewer maintenance people on staff, etc. they probably share the same view that Wendy's and Carl's Jr/Hardees share with a greater push towards automation. The only reason they haven't outsourced the jobs is because it still needs a warm body in the parks. The one way they were combatting this was by having a heavier reliance on temporary workers, you can pay them the minimum and no benefits/sick days. Now, their pay is rising to $15/hr and are required to be given sick leave. Just because you are not able to do the same terrible things that other companies have, doesn't automatically make you better.