I totally agree. I'd love for them to change WDI back to WED, just as I'd like to see the TTA go back to being the WEDway People Mover. Of course, I guess that I lean toward being a traditionalist when it comes to many things associated with WDW. I actually don't mind the creativity that the Pixar team can add, because it could bring fresh ideas that work.Captain Schnemo wrote:He just said that the Pixar guys are behind the change, not that they want to Pixarize it. If that's true, and they really do revert WDI's name back to WED, I think I might actually have to go back to WDW and spend some money, just to reward them.
Just listened to Journey Into Imagination ride-thru...
Moderator: Moderators
-
SimonTemplar
- Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain

- Posts: 325
- Joined: Mar Mon 27, 2006 5:45 pm
- Location: Main Street USA
"Here in Florida, we have something special we never enjoyed at Disneyland...the blessing of size. There's enough land here to hold all the ideas and plans we can possibly imagine." ~ Walt Disney
-
Captain Schnemo
- Columbia Sailing Ship Admiral

- Posts: 938
- Joined: Oct Tue 18, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Seabase Omega
-
jrcohen
- Peter Pan's Flight Pixie Duster

- Posts: 520
- Joined: Apr Thu 07, 2005 9:17 am
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
I start optomistic everytime I hear about changes to the pavilians and additions to the park. I try to keep an open mind and not agree with other people's opinions until I've seen the changes myself. Many times these changes are for the best, like randomizing the drops on ToT (great move), but once in a while you get JII without Figment. That's just wrong. Now hopefully if there are changes to the Imagination pavilian it will come out great. But it seems to me that they've already changed this pavilian 3 times? And they keep making changes because they're trying to recapture the magic that the original Imagination had. The thing that worries me is that they'll do what they did with WoM and Horizions and change the pavilian completely.
Please keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Thank you, and enjoy the rest of your day here at Walt Disney World.
It'd be interesting to see what a new set of creative eyes would make of an attraction based upon the broad theme "imagination." In some ways, I think this is the core problem with the attraction. The idea of spotlighting "imagination" sounds good but there are as many different opinions on what that means as there are riders.
I liked Figment as a personification of imagination, but some of the stuff in the original ride seemed like they were just there to take up space. Remember Figment holding the blocks that said "cat" --- "bat"?
I liked Figment as a personification of imagination, but some of the stuff in the original ride seemed like they were just there to take up space. Remember Figment holding the blocks that said "cat" --- "bat"?
No one's gloomy or complaining while the flatware's entertaining.
-
SpookyBear
- Alice in Wonderland Wonderer

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Mar Tue 07, 2006 11:59 am
It may be difficult to define what imagination is, but I think the orginal version of the ride pulled it off nicely. There was so much eye candy inside of the ride that everytime I went on I saw something new.horizons1 wrote:It'd be interesting to see what a new set of creative eyes would make of an attraction based upon the broad theme "imagination." In some ways, I think this is the core problem with the attraction. The idea of spotlighting "imagination" sounds good but there are as many different opinions on what that means as there are riders.
I liked Figment as a personification of imagination, but some of the stuff in the original ride seemed like they were just there to take up space. Remember Figment holding the blocks that said "cat" --- "bat"?
Also how much space did the Figment with the blocks really take up?
-
Captain Schnemo
- Columbia Sailing Ship Admiral

- Posts: 938
- Joined: Oct Tue 18, 2005 2:18 am
- Location: Seabase Omega
I thought the Figment block/shadow trick was cool. The ride was all about abstract thought, so I thought it fit in nicely.
More importantly, the original attraction was about how everything in the rest of Future World (and human development in general) started with people willing to think outside the box. The new attraction is all about trying to inflict imagination upon the riders.
So, instead of a request to the audience to please use your brain once in a while, because it's fun and important, the new ride tells the audience to sit quietly and let Disney imagine for you.
It's a fundamentally insulting and depressing change.
More importantly, the original attraction was about how everything in the rest of Future World (and human development in general) started with people willing to think outside the box. The new attraction is all about trying to inflict imagination upon the riders.
So, instead of a request to the audience to please use your brain once in a while, because it's fun and important, the new ride tells the audience to sit quietly and let Disney imagine for you.
It's a fundamentally insulting and depressing change.
-
jrcohen
- Peter Pan's Flight Pixie Duster

- Posts: 520
- Joined: Apr Thu 07, 2005 9:17 am
- Location: Austin, TX
- Contact:
Wow, I never thought about it that way. Seems a bit pessamistic about the images that Disney is trying to create.Captain Schnemo wrote:I thought the Figment block/shadow trick was cool. The ride was all about abstract thought, so I thought it fit in nicely.
More importantly, the original attraction was about how everything in the rest of Future World (and human development in general) started with people willing to think outside the box. The new attraction is all about trying to inflict imagination upon the riders.
So, instead of a request to the audience to please use your brain once in a while, because it's fun and important, the new ride tells the audience to sit quietly and let Disney imagine for you.
It's a fundamentally insulting and depressing change.
Please keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle until the ride comes to a full and complete stop. Thank you, and enjoy the rest of your day here at Walt Disney World.
-
nancynohorse
- Mike Fink Keel Boats Boatswain

- Posts: 304
- Joined: Apr Sun 08, 2007 12:28 pm
-
casrin
- Columbia Sailing Ship Admiral

- Posts: 919
- Joined: Mar Thu 15, 2007 8:12 am
- Location: The Dreamport
When you figure how long ago the original Honey I Shrunk the Kids came out... 1989?... it goes to show how over-due they are for a new film. When did they put in Audience? 1993 or so? 14 years is a long time for a film like that to stay in... it's not a cool, trendy movie anymore.Michael Jackson wasn't quite the freak he is today when Captain EO came out - it was brilliant at the time and it's great to relive it here. By the way, is anyone else here TOTALLY over Honey I Shrunk the Audidence? I'm really ready for a new 4-D movie there.
-[b]casrin[/b]
[url=http://ubanimator.com][img]http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~cparkins/images/userbar/userbar487580pb0.gif[/img][/url]
[url=http://ubanimator.com][img]http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~cparkins/images/userbar/userbar487580pb0.gif[/img][/url]
I think that's a very good point. It is too bad I never saw the original in person. I've seen a youtube video of it and it looked really cool! Better then what I saw when I went (where mirrors judge your imagination).Captain Schnemo wrote: So, instead of a request to the audience to please use your brain once in a while, because it's fun and important, the new ride tells the audience to sit quietly and let Disney imagine for you.
It's a fundamentally insulting and depressing change.
-
octoberbarry
- Main Street Cinema Projectionist

- Posts: 71
- Joined: May Sat 12, 2007 6:13 am



